A1858   Kaufman
No Same as
Civil Practice Law and Rules
TITLE....Authorizes the use of a transcript or reproduction of a record where a subpoena duces tecum is served upon a physician practice
| 01/16/01 | referred to codes | |
| 01/09/02 | referred to codes |
KAUFMAN
Amd S2306, CPLR
Authorizes the use of a transcript or reproduction of a record certified as
correct by a person authorized to receive service under article three of the
civil practice law and rules where a subpoena duces tecum is served upon a
physician practice.
STATE OF NEW YORK
________________________________________________________________________
1858
2001-2002 Regular Sessions
IN ASSEMBLY
January 16, 2001
___________
Introduced by M. of A. KAUFMAN -- read once and referred to the Commit-
tee on Codes
AN ACT to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to service
of a subpoena duces tecum upon a physician practice
The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-
bly, do enact as follows:
1 Section 1. Subdivision (a) of section 2306 of the civil practice law
2 and rules, as amended by chapter 4 of the laws of 1986, is amended to
3 read as follows:
4 (a) Transcript or reproduction. Where a subpoena duces tecum is served
5 upon a hospital, physician practice, or upon a department or bureau of a
6 municipal corporation or of the state, or an officer thereof, requiring
7 the production of records relating to the condition or treatment of a
8 patient, a transcript or a full-sized legible reproduction, certified as
9 correct by the superintendent or head of the hospital, department or
10 bureau or his assistant, or the officer, or in the case of a physician
11 practice, a person authorized to receive service under article three of
12 this chapter, may be produced unless otherwise ordered by a court. Such
13 a subpoena shall be served at least three days before the time fixed for
14 the production of the records unless otherwise ordered by a court.
15 § 2. This act shall take effect immediately.
EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD01345-01-1
NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(e)
  BILL NUMBER: A1858 SPONSOR: Kaufman
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to service of a subpoena duces tecum upon a physician practice   PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: To permit physicians to comply with a subpoena duces tecum request for medical records by providing the court with a certified copy of such records.   SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: Amends Section 2306 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules to permit a physician practice to respond to a subpoena duces tecum request for medical records to fulfill such request by giving the requesting party a certified copy of such records, as certified by any person in the physi- cian's office who is authorized to accept service of process on behalf of the practice.   JUSTIFICATION: Under current law, when a party to a civil proceeding seeks from a physician, via a judicial subpoena duces tecum, a patient's medical records, a physician is required under CPLR Section 2305 to produce those medical records. However, a hospital or governmental unit who is served the same subpoena duces tecum may comply with such request by providing a full-sized legible reproduction, provided it is certified a correct by the superintendent or head of the hospital, department or bureau. There is no good reason for the distinction in the law between a hospital and a physician office practice as it relates to medical records, being required to be produced. Moreover, there are many reasons that a physician may need to keep the original records, such as if the physician is still treating the patient, or if there is a concurrent investigation by the Office of Professional Medical Conduct (OPMC) or by the federal government. This bill would correct this discrepancy in the law and permit a physician to comply by providing a full-sized reprod- uction to comply with the subpoena duces tecum.   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2000: A.9796/S.7096 - Passed Senate   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None.   EFFECTIVE DATE: Immediately.