A9400   Rules (Gottfried)   No Same as
Civil Practice Law and Rules
TITLE....Provides that an affirmation of a health care practitioner may be served or filed in an action in lieu of and with same force and effect as an affidavit
08/02/01 referred to codes
01/09/02 referred to codes
04/30/02 reported
05/02/02 advanced to third reading cal.350
05/06/02 passed assembly
05/06/02 delivered to senate
05/06/02 REFERRED TO CODES


RULES COM (Request of Gottfried)
Amd R2106, CPLR
Provides that an affirmation of a health care practitioner may be served or filed in an action in lieu or and with same force and effect as an affidavit (changes the current reference in existing provisions from "physician, osteopath or dentist" to "health care practitioner").

RETRIEVE BILL

 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
       ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                         9400
 
                              2001-2002 Regular Sessions
 
                   IN ASSEMBLY
 
                                    August 2, 2001
                                      ___________
 
       Introduced  by  COMMITTEE ON RULES -- (at request of M. of A. Gottfried)
         -- read once and referred to the Committee on Codes
 
       AN ACT to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to  chang-
         ing  reference  from  physician,  osteopath  or dentist to health care
         practitioner
 
         The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and  Assem-
       bly, do enact as follows:
 
    1    Section  1.  Rule 2106 of the civil practice law and rules, as amended
    2  by judicial conference proposal No. 3 for the year 1973, is  amended  to
    3  read as follows:
    4    Rule  2106. Affirmation of truth of statement by attorney[, physician,
    5  osteopath or dentist] or health care practitioner.  The statement of  an
    6  attorney  admitted  to  practice  in  the  courts  of the state, or of a
    7  [physician, osteopath or dentist] health care  practitioner,  authorized
    8  by  title  8 of the education law to practice in the state, who is not a
    9  party to an action, when subscribed and affirmed by him  or  her  to  be
   10  true  under  the  penalties  of  perjury,  may be served or filed in the
   11  action in lieu of and with the same force and effect as an affidavit.
   12    § 2. This act shall take effect immediately.
 
 
 
 
 
        EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                             [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                  LBD09749-01-1

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(e)
RETRIEVE BILL
 
BILL NUMBER: A9400
 
SPONSOR: Rules (Gottfried)
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to changing reference from physician, osteopath or dentist to health care practitioner   SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: Amends rule 2106 section 1 of the civil practice laws and rules. Would extend to all licensed health care practitioners to the right of affirmation of affidavits.   JUSTIFICATION: CPLR 2106 was intended to ease the burdens of attor- neys who, as a prerequisite to the submission of their own sworn written statement in an action, were required under prior law to find a notary public to administer an oath. The drafters of the CPLR determined that the attorney's professional obligations and the possibility of prose- cution for making a false statement provided sufficient safeguards to dispense with the need for an appearance by the attorney before a notary public. Thus, the attorney is authorized by CPLR 2106 to simply sign his or her own statement and affirm its truth subject to the penalties of perjury. Such affirmation has the same effect as an affidavit sworn to before a notary public. Similar considerations of convenience led to an amendment of the statute in 1973 to extend the same right of affirmation to physicians, osteo- paths and dentists, whose affidavits are also frequently required in civil litigation. It is appropriate that this right be extended to other practitioners.   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: A6945 of 1999-2000   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None   EFFECTIVE DATE: Immediately