S295   KRUGER
No Same as
ON FILE: 01/09/02 Civil Practice Law and Rules
TITLE....Makes prayer for damages in negligence action general rather than specific
| | | |
| 01/03/01 | REFERRED TO CODES |
| 01/09/02 | REFERRED TO CODES |
KRUGER, HASSELL-THOMPSON
Amd S3017, CPLR
Provides that the amount of damages sought in a negligence cause of
action shall not be stated in the complaint, cross claim,
interpleader complaint and third-party complaint; provides that the party
against whom such action is brought may, at any time, request a supplemental
demand which states the total damages sought by the pleader.
RETRIEVE BILL
STATE OF NEW YORK
________________________________________________________________________
295
2001-2002 Regular Sessions
IN SENATE
(Prefiled)
January 3, 2001
___________
Introduced by Sen. KRUGER -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
printed to be committed to the Committee on Codes
AN ACT to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to prayer
for damages in negligence actions
The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-
bly, do enact as follows:
1 Section 1. Subdivision (c) of section 3017 of the civil practice law
2 and rules, as amended by chapter 442 of the laws of 1989, is amended to
3 read as follows:
4 (c) Medical or dental malpractice action, negligence action or action
5 against a municipal corporation. In an action for medical or dental
6 malpractice, negligence action or in an action against a municipal
7 corporation, as defined in section two of the general municipal law, the
8 complaint, counterclaim, cross-claim, interpleader complaint, and third-
9 party complaint shall contain a prayer for general relief but shall not
10 state the amount of damages to which the pleader deems himself entitled.
11 If the action is brought in the supreme court, the pleading shall also
12 state whether or not the amount of damages sought exceeds the jurisdic-
13 tional limits of all lower courts which would otherwise have jurisdic-
14 tion. Provided, however, that a party against whom an action for
15 medical or dental malpractice or negligence is brought or the municipal
16 corporation, may at any time request a supplemental demand setting forth
17 the total damages to which the pleader deems himself entitled. A supple-
18 mental demand shall be provided by the party bringing the action within
19 fifteen days of the request. In the event the supplemental demand is not
20 served within fifteen days, the court, on motion, may order that it be
21 served. A supplemental demand served pursuant to this subdivision shall
22 be treated in all respects as a demand made pursuant to subdivision (a)
23 of this section.
24 § 2. This act shall take effect immediately.
EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD03509-01-1
NEW YORK STATE SENATE
INTRODUCER'S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT
submitted in accordance with Senate Rule VI. Sec 1
RETRIEVE BILL
 
BILL NUMBER: S295
SPONSOR: KRUGER
 
TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the civil practice law and rules, in
relation to prayer for damages in negligence actions
 
SUMMARY:
This bill would amend CPLR 3017 to prohibit the pleader in negligence
actions from stating a specific amount of damages to which he deems
himself entitled. It would, however, permit the party against whom a
negligence action is brought to obtain such information.
 
JUSTIFICATION:
In 1975, the legislature added new subdivision (c) to section 3017 of
the CPLR to prohibit the pleader in medical malpractice actions from
stating the amount of relief to which he deems himself entitled, but,
permitting the party against whom an action is brought to obtain such
information. At that time, this restriction was enacted in an attempt to
reduce many of the abuses of the medical malpractice system, such as
excessive damage awards. Because plaintiffs frequently made emotional
and unrealistic demands in their complaints, juries and courts frequent-
ly entered excessive awards.
A similar problem exists today regarding negligence actions. This bill,
by extending the restriction on stating a specific damage figure in the
pleadings to all negligence actions, would help alleviate this problem.
 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None.
 
EFFECTIVE DATE:
This act shall take effect immediately.